[PATCH 5.10 CANDIDATE 0/2] Two more xfs backports for 5.10.y (from v5.11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Darrick,

These two backports were selected by Chandan for 5.4.y, but are
currently missing from 5.10.y.

I've put them through the usual kdevops testing routine.

This is the second time that I have considered patch #2 for 5.10.y.
The last time around, I observed increased the probablity of a known
buffer corruption assertion when running xfs/076, so I suspected
a regression, and dropped it from the submission [1].

At the time, the alleged regression happened only in the kdevops setup
and neither I nor Brain were able to understand why that happens [2].
This time around, the kdevops setup did not observe that odd regression.

Thanks,
Amir.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220601104547.260949-1-amir73il@xxxxxxxxx/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/YpY6hUknor2S1iMd@bfoster/T/#mf1add66b8309a75a8984f28ea08718f22033bce7

Brian Foster (1):
  xfs: don't reuse busy extents on extent trim

Darrick J. Wong (1):
  xfs: shut down the filesystem if we screw up quota reservation

 fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 14 --------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux