On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:50:30PM +0800, Guo Xuenan wrote: > xfs log io error will trigger xlog shut down, and end_io worker call > xlog_state_shutdown_callbacks to unpin and release the buf log item. > The race condition is that when there are some thread doing transaction > commit and happened not to be intercepted by xlog_is_shutdown, then, > these log item will be insert into CIL, when unpin and release these > buf log item, UAF will occur. BTW, add delay before `xlog_cil_commit` > can increase recurrence probability. > > The following call graph actually encountered this bad situation. > fsstress io end worker kworker/0:1H-216 > xlog_ioend_work > ->xlog_force_shutdown > ->xlog_state_shutdown_callbacks > ->xlog_cil_process_committed > ->xlog_cil_committed > ->xfs_trans_committed_bulk Odd switch from ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ spaces to tabs here. > ->xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas ->li_ops->iop_unpin(lip, 1); > ->xfs_trans_getsb > ->_xfs_trans_bjoin > ->xfs_buf_item_init > ->if (bip) { return 0;} //relog > ->xlog_cil_commit > ->xlog_cil_insert_items //insert into CIL Why are we still inserting things into the CIL of a dead log? > ->xfs_buf_ioend_fail(bp); > ->xfs_buf_ioend > ->xfs_buf_item_done > ->xfs_buf_item_relse > ->xfs_buf_item_free > > when cil push worker gather percpu cil and insert super block buf log item > into ctx->log_items then uaf occurs. > > ================================================================== > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in xlog_cil_push_work+0x1c8f/0x22f0 > Write of size 8 at addr ffff88801800f3f0 by task kworker/u4:4/105 > > CPU: 0 PID: 105 Comm: kworker/u4:4 Tainted: G W > 6.1.0-rc1-00001-g274115149b42 #136 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS > 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 > Workqueue: xfs-cil/sda xlog_cil_push_work > Call Trace: > <TASK> > dump_stack_lvl+0x4d/0x66 > print_report+0x171/0x4a6 > kasan_report+0xb3/0x130 > xlog_cil_push_work+0x1c8f/0x22f0 > process_one_work+0x6f9/0xf70 > worker_thread+0x578/0xf30 > kthread+0x28c/0x330 > ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 > </TASK> > > Allocated by task 2145: > kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 > kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 > __kasan_slab_alloc+0x54/0x60 > kmem_cache_alloc+0x14a/0x510 > xfs_buf_item_init+0x160/0x6d0 > _xfs_trans_bjoin+0x7f/0x2e0 > xfs_trans_getsb+0xb6/0x3f0 > xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas+0x1f/0x8c0 > __xfs_trans_commit+0xa25/0xe10 > xfs_symlink+0xe23/0x1660 > xfs_vn_symlink+0x157/0x280 > vfs_symlink+0x491/0x790 > do_symlinkat+0x128/0x220 > __x64_sys_symlink+0x7a/0x90 > do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd > > Freed by task 216: > kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 > kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 > kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x40 > __kasan_slab_free+0x105/0x1a0 > kmem_cache_free+0xb6/0x460 > xfs_buf_ioend+0x1e9/0x11f0 > xfs_buf_item_unpin+0x3d6/0x840 > xfs_trans_committed_bulk+0x4c2/0x7c0 > xlog_cil_committed+0xab6/0xfb0 > xlog_cil_process_committed+0x117/0x1e0 > xlog_state_shutdown_callbacks+0x208/0x440 > xlog_force_shutdown+0x1b3/0x3a0 > xlog_ioend_work+0xef/0x1d0 > process_one_work+0x6f9/0xf70 > worker_thread+0x578/0xf30 > kthread+0x28c/0x330 > ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 > > The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88801800f388 > which belongs to the cache xfs_buf_item of size 272 > The buggy address is located 104 bytes inside of > 272-byte region [ffff88801800f388, ffff88801800f498) > > The buggy address belongs to the physical page: > page:ffffea0000600380 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 > index:0xffff88801800f208 pfn:0x1800e > head:ffffea0000600380 order:1 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0 > flags: 0x1fffff80010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) > raw: 001fffff80010200 ffffea0000699788 ffff88801319db50 ffff88800fb50640 > raw: ffff88801800f208 000000000015000a 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 > page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected > > Memory state around the buggy address: > ffff88801800f280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb > ffff88801800f300: fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc > >ffff88801800f380: fc fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb > ^ > ffff88801800f400: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb > ffff88801800f480: fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc > ================================================================== > Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint > > Signed-off-by: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c > index 522d450a94b1..df7322ed73fa 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c > @@ -1018,6 +1018,8 @@ xfs_buf_item_relse( > trace_xfs_buf_item_relse(bp, _RET_IP_); > ASSERT(!test_bit(XFS_LI_IN_AIL, &bip->bli_item.li_flags)); > > + if (atomic_read(&bip->bli_refcount)) > + return; If we're releasing the buf item, shouldn't this be an atomic_dec_and_test or something? --D > bp->b_log_item = NULL; > xfs_buf_rele(bp); > xfs_buf_item_free(bip); > -- > 2.31.1 >