On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 10:36:48PM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> The following error occurred during the fsstress test:
> XFS: Assertion failed: VFS_I(ip)->i_nlink >= 2, file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 2925
What kernel is this? xfs_inode.c line 2925 is in the middle of
xfs_rename and doesn't have any assertions on nlink.
The only assertion on nlink in the entire xfs codebase is in xfs_remove,
and that's not what's going on here.
<confused>
--D
> The problem was that inode race condition causes incorrect i_nlink to be
> written to disk, and then it is read into memory. Consider the following
> call graph, inodes that are marked as both XFS_IFLUSHING and
> XFS_IRECLAIMABLE, i_nlink will be reset to 1 and then restored to original
> value in xfs_reinit_inode(). Therefore, the i_nlink of directory on disk
> may be set to 1.
>
> xfsaild
> xfs_inode_item_push
> xfs_iflush_cluster
> xfs_iflush
> xfs_inode_to_disk
>
> xfs_iget
> xfs_iget_cache_hit
> xfs_iget_recycle
> xfs_reinit_inode
> inode_init_always
>
> So skip inodes that being flushed and markded as XFS_IRECLAIMABLE, prevent
> concurrent read and write to inodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> index eae7427062cf..cc68b0ff50ce 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> @@ -514,6 +514,11 @@ xfs_iget_cache_hit(
> (ip->i_flags & XFS_IRECLAIMABLE))
> goto out_skip;
>
> + /* Skip inodes that being flushed */
> + if ((ip->i_flags & XFS_IFLUSHING) &&
> + (ip->i_flags & XFS_IRECLAIMABLE))
> + goto out_skip;
> +
> /* The inode fits the selection criteria; process it. */
> if (ip->i_flags & XFS_IRECLAIMABLE) {
> /* Drops i_flags_lock and RCU read lock. */
> --
> 2.31.1
>
