> However, I noticed that the callsite in the WARNING: message has changed > from the usual 'asswarn' (which is the caller of WARN_ON) to > 'xfs_buf_alert_ratelimited', which seems totally wrong since XFS log > recovery doesn't touch xfs_buf objects at all. Yeah; and I've meanwhile found more cases where it goes sideways. I'll revert this patch and try an alternative approach. I'll post patches tomorrow or something. Sorry about this.
