https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216566 --- Comment #1 from Dave Chinner (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) --- On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 05:47:49PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216566 > > Bug ID: 216566 > Summary: [xfstests generic/648] BUG: unable to handle page > fault, RIP: 0010:__xfs_dir3_data_check+0x171/0x700 > [xfs] > Product: File System > Version: 2.5 > Kernel Version: v6.1-rc0 > Hardware: All > OS: Linux > Tree: Mainline > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P1 > Component: XFS > Assignee: filesystem_xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Reporter: zlang@xxxxxxxxxx > Regression: No > > xfstests generic/648 hit kernel panic[1] on xfs with 64k directory block size > (-n size=65536), before panic, there's a kernel assertion (not sure if it's > related). > > It's reproducable, but not easy. Generally I reproduced it by loop running > generic/648 on xfs (-n size=65536) hundreds of time. > > The last time I hit this panic on linux with HEAD= Given that there have been no changes to XFS committed in v6.1-rc0 at this point in time, this won't be an XFS regression unless you can reproduce it on 6.0 or 5.19 kernels, too. Regardless, I'd suggest bisection is in order to find where the problem was introduced. -Dave. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
