Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: fix warnings/errors due to missing include

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 08:34:23PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 2022-10-04 20:28, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 08:11:05PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> > > 
> > > Gentoo is currently trying to rebuild the world with clang-16, uncovering exciting
> > > new errors in many packages since several warnings have been turned into errors,
> > > among them missing prototypes, as documented at:
> > > https://discourse.llvm.org/t/clang-16-notice-of-potentially-breaking-changes/65562
> > > 
> > > xfsprogs came up, with details at https://bugs.gentoo.org/875050.
> > > 
> > > The problem was easy to find: a missing include for the u_init/u_cleanup
> > > prototypes. The error:
> > > 
> > > Building scrub
> > >      [CC]     unicrash.o
> > > unicrash.c:746:2: error: call to undeclared function 'u_init'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > >          u_init(&uerr);
> > >          ^
> > > unicrash.c:746:2: note: did you mean 'u_digit'?
> > > /usr/include/unicode/uchar.h:4073:1: note: 'u_digit' declared here
> > > u_digit(UChar32 ch, int8_t radix);
> > > ^
> > > unicrash.c:754:2: error: call to undeclared function 'u_cleanup'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > >          u_cleanup();
> > >          ^
> > > 2 errors generated.
> > > 
> > > The complaint is valid and the fix is easy enough: just add the missing include.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Aha, that explains why I kept hearing reports about this but could never
> > get gcc to spit out this error.  Thanks for fixing this.
> 
> You're welcome. This reproduces with gcc when explicitly enabled:
> 
> $CFLAGS="-Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int" ./configure

Huh.  I don't know why my system won't complain.

$ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 11.2.0-19ubuntu1) 11.2.0
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is
NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE.

$ gcc -Wall -g -O3 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-Wno-address-of-packed-member -femit-struct-debug-detailed=any
-Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable -Wuninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign
-Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -fstack-usage -Werror
-Wno-sign-compare -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wmaybe-uninitialized
-Wno-error=unused-function -Wno-error=unused-variable
-Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
-Werror=implicit-int   -g -O2 -DDEBUG
-DVERSION=\"6.1.0-rc0~WIP-2022-10-03\" -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\"
-DPACKAGE=\"xfsprogs\" -I../include -I../libxfs -I.. -D_LGPL_SOURCE
-D_GNU_SOURCE -funsigned-char -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Werror -Wextra
-Wno-unused-parameter -DHAVE_MNTENT -DHAVE_FSETXATTR -DENABLE_BLKID
-DHAVE_GETFSMAP -DHAVE_GETFSREFCOUNTS -DHAVE_FALLOCATE
-DHAVE_LIBURCU_ATOMIC64 -DHAVE_MALLINFO -DHAVE_MALLINFO2 -DHAVE_SYNCFS
-DHAVE_LIBATTR -DHAVE_LIBICU  -DHAVE_SG_IO -DHAVE_HDIO_GETGEO -c
unicrash.c
$

--D
> 
> cheers,
> Holger



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux