[PATCH 1/2] xfs: skip fscounters comparisons when the scan is incomplete

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

If any part of the per-AG summary counter scan loop aborts without
collecting all of the data we need, the scrubber's observation data will
be invalid.  Set the incomplete flag so that we abort the scrub without
reporting false corruptions.  Document the data dependency here too.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
index 3c66523ec212..c869b537fe34 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/fscounters.c
@@ -145,6 +145,18 @@ xchk_setup_fscounters(
 	return xchk_trans_alloc(sc, 0);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Part 1: Collecting filesystem summary counts.  For each AG, we add its
+ * summary counts (total inodes, free inodes, free data blocks) to an incore
+ * copy of the overall filesystem summary counts.
+ *
+ * To avoid false corruption reports in part 2, any failure in this part must
+ * set the INCOMPLETE flag even when a negative errno is returned.  This care
+ * must be taken with certain errno values (i.e. EFSBADCRC, EFSCORRUPTED,
+ * ECANCELED) that are absorbed into a scrub state flag update by
+ * xchk_*_process_error.
+ */
+
 /* Count free space btree blocks manually for pre-lazysbcount filesystems. */
 static int
 xchk_fscount_btreeblks(
@@ -232,8 +244,10 @@ xchk_fscount_aggregate_agcounts(
 	}
 	if (pag)
 		xfs_perag_put(pag);
-	if (error)
+	if (error) {
+		xchk_set_incomplete(sc);
 		return error;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * The global incore space reservation is taken from the incore
@@ -274,6 +288,11 @@ xchk_fscount_aggregate_agcounts(
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Part 2: Comparing filesystem summary counters.  All we have to do here is
+ * sum the percpu counters and compare them to what we've observed.
+ */
+
 /*
  * Is the @counter reasonably close to the @expected value?
  *




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux