Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, pmem, xfs: Introduce MF_MEM_REMOVE for unbind

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





在 2022/9/15 2:15, Darrick J. Wong 写道:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 10:36:01AM +0000, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
This patch is inspired by Dan's "mm, dax, pmem: Introduce
dev_pagemap_failure()"[1].  With the help of dax_holder and
->notify_failure() mechanism, the pmem driver is able to ask filesystem
(or mapped device) on it to unmap all files in use and notify processes
who are using those files.

Call trace:
trigger unbind
  -> unbind_store()
   -> ... (skip)
    -> devres_release_all()   # was pmem driver ->remove() in v1
     -> kill_dax()
      -> dax_holder_notify_failure(dax_dev, 0, U64_MAX, MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE)
       -> xfs_dax_notify_failure()

Introduce MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE to let filesystem know this is a remove
event.  So do not shutdown filesystem directly if something not
supported, or if failure range includes metadata area.  Make sure all
files and processes are handled correctly.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/161604050314.1463742.14151665140035795571.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/dax/super.c         |  3 ++-
  fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/mm.h          |  1 +
  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dax/super.c b/drivers/dax/super.c
index 9b5e2a5eb0ae..cf9a64563fbe 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/super.c
+++ b/drivers/dax/super.c
@@ -323,7 +323,8 @@ void kill_dax(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
  		return;
if (dax_dev->holder_data != NULL)
-		dax_holder_notify_failure(dax_dev, 0, U64_MAX, 0);
+		dax_holder_notify_failure(dax_dev, 0, U64_MAX,
+				MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE);
clear_bit(DAXDEV_ALIVE, &dax_dev->flags);
  	synchronize_srcu(&dax_srcu);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c
index 3830f908e215..5e04ba7fa403 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
  #include <linux/dax.h>
+#include <linux/fs.h>
struct xfs_failure_info {
  	xfs_agblock_t		startblock;
@@ -77,6 +78,9 @@ xfs_dax_failure_fn(
if (XFS_RMAP_NON_INODE_OWNER(rec->rm_owner) ||
  	    (rec->rm_flags & (XFS_RMAP_ATTR_FORK | XFS_RMAP_BMBT_BLOCK))) {
+		/* The device is about to be removed.  Not a really failure. */
+		if (notify->mf_flags & MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE)
+			return 0;
  		notify->want_shutdown = true;
  		return 0;
  	}
@@ -182,12 +186,23 @@ xfs_dax_notify_failure(
  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = dax_holder(dax_dev);
  	u64			ddev_start;
  	u64			ddev_end;
+	int			error;
if (!(mp->m_super->s_flags & SB_BORN)) {
  		xfs_warn(mp, "filesystem is not ready for notify_failure()!");
  		return -EIO;
  	}
+ if (mf_flags & MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE) {
+		xfs_info(mp, "device is about to be removed!");
+		down_write(&mp->m_super->s_umount);
+		error = sync_filesystem(mp->m_super);
+		drop_pagecache_sb(mp->m_super, NULL);
+		up_write(&mp->m_super->s_umount);
+		if (error)
+			return error;
+	}
+
  	if (mp->m_rtdev_targp && mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_daxdev == dax_dev) {
  		xfs_debug(mp,
  			 "notify_failure() not supported on realtime device!");
@@ -196,6 +211,8 @@ xfs_dax_notify_failure(
if (mp->m_logdev_targp && mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_daxdev == dax_dev &&
  	    mp->m_logdev_targp != mp->m_ddev_targp) {
+		if (mf_flags & MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE)
+			return 0;
  		xfs_err(mp, "ondisk log corrupt, shutting down fs!");
  		xfs_force_shutdown(mp, SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_ONDISK);
  		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
@@ -209,6 +226,12 @@ xfs_dax_notify_failure(
  	ddev_start = mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_dax_part_off;
  	ddev_end = ddev_start + bdev_nr_bytes(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev) - 1;
+ /* Notify failure on the whole device */
+	if (offset == 0 && len == U64_MAX) {
+		offset = ddev_start;
+		len = bdev_nr_bytes(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev);
+	}

I wonder, won't the trimming code below take care of this?

The len is U64_MAX, so 'offset + len - 1' will overflow. That can't be handled correctly by the trimming code below.


--
Thanks,
Ruan.


The rest of the patch looks ok to me.

--D

+
  	/* Ignore the range out of filesystem area */
  	if (offset + len - 1 < ddev_start)
  		return -ENXIO;
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 21f8b27bd9fd..9122a1c57dd2 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -3183,6 +3183,7 @@ enum mf_flags {
  	MF_UNPOISON = 1 << 4,
  	MF_SW_SIMULATED = 1 << 5,
  	MF_NO_RETRY = 1 << 6,
+	MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE = 1 << 7,
  };
  int mf_dax_kill_procs(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
  		      unsigned long count, int mf_flags);
--
2.37.2




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux