Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix uaf when leaf dir bestcount not match with dir data blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 11:31:54AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 08:16:39PM +0800, Guo Xuenan wrote:
> > For leaf dir, In most cases, there should be as many bestfree slots
> > as the dir data blocks that can fit under i_size (except for [1]).
> > 
> > Root cause is we don't examin the number bestfree slots, when the slots
> > number less than dir data blocks, if we need to allocate new dir data
> > block and update the bestfree array, we will use the dir block number as
> > index to assign bestfree array, while we did not check the leaf buf
> > boundary which may cause UAF or other memory access problem. This issue
> > can also triggered with test cases xfs/473 from fstests.
> > 
> > Considering the special case [1] , only add check bestfree array boundary,
> > to avoid UAF or slab-out-of bound.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/163961697197.3129691.1911552605195534271.stgit@magnolia/
> > 
> > Simplify the testcase xfs/473 with commands below:
> > DEV=/dev/sdb
> > MP=/mnt/sdb
> > WORKDIR=/mnt/sdb/341 #1. mkfs create new xfs image
> > mkfs.xfs -f ${DEV}
> > mount ${DEV} ${MP}
> > mkdir -p ${WORKDIR}
> > for i in `seq 1 341` #2. create leaf dir with 341 entries file name len 8
> > do
> >     touch ${WORKDIR}/$(printf "%08d" ${i})
> > done
> > inode=$(ls -i ${MP} | cut -d' ' -f1)
> > umount ${MP}         #3. xfs_db set bestcount to 0
> > xfs_db -x ${DEV} -c "inode ${inode}" -c "dblock 8388608" \
> > -c "write ltail.bestcount 0"
> > mount ${DEV} ${MP}
> > touch ${WORKDIR}/{1..100}.txt #4. touch new file, reproduce
> .....
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
> > index d9b66306a9a7..4b2a72b3a6f3 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
> > @@ -819,6 +819,18 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_addname(
> >  		 */
> >  		else
> >  			xfs_dir3_leaf_log_bests(args, lbp, use_block, use_block);
> > +		/*
> > +		 * An abnormal corner case, bestfree count less than data
> > +		 * blocks, add a condition to avoid UAF or slab-out-of bound.
> > +		 */
> > +		if ((char *)(&bestsp[use_block]) > (char *)ltp) {

Aha, so this /can/ be detected by walking off the end of the buffer...

> > +			xfs_trans_brelse(tp, lbp);
> > +			if (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_DIRTY)
> > +				xfs_force_shutdown(tp->t_mountp,
> > +						SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_ONDISK);
> > +			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > +		}
> > +
> 
> As I explained here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220829081244.GT3600936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> We don't check for overruns caused by on-disk format corruptions in
> every operation - we catch the corruption when the metadata is first
> read into memory via the verifier.
> 
> Please add a check for a corrupt/mismatched best sizes array to
> xfs_dir3_leaf_check_int() so that the corruption is detected on
> first read and the internal directory code is never exposed to such
> issues.

...in which case this should go in the buffer verifier.  Seconded.

--D

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux