[PATCH] iversion: update comments with info about atime updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Add an explicit paragraph codifying that atime updates due to reads
should not be counted against the i_version counter. None of the
existing subsystems that use the i_version want those counted, and
there is an easy workaround for those that do.

Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/166086932784.5425.17134712694961326033@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/#t
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/iversion.h | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/iversion.h b/include/linux/iversion.h
index 3bfebde5a1a6..da6cc1cc520a 100644
--- a/include/linux/iversion.h
+++ b/include/linux/iversion.h
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
  * ---------------------------
  * The change attribute (i_version) is mandated by NFSv4 and is mostly for
  * knfsd, but is also used for other purposes (e.g. IMA). The i_version must
- * appear different to observers if there was a change to the inode's data or
- * metadata since it was last queried.
+ * appear different to observers if there was an explicit change to the inode's
+ * data or metadata since it was last queried.
  *
  * Observers see the i_version as a 64-bit number that never decreases. If it
  * remains the same since it was last checked, then nothing has changed in the
@@ -18,6 +18,12 @@
  * anything about the nature or magnitude of the changes from the value, only
  * that the inode has changed in some fashion.
  *
+ * Note that atime updates due to reads or similar activity do _not_ represent
+ * an explicit change to the inode. If the only change is to the atime and it
+ * wasn't set via utimes() or a similar mechanism, then i_version should not be
+ * incremented. If an observer cares about atime updates, it should plan to
+ * fetch and store them in conjunction with the i_version.
+ *
  * Not all filesystems properly implement the i_version counter. Subsystems that
  * want to use i_version field on an inode should first check whether the
  * filesystem sets the SB_I_VERSION flag (usually via the IS_I_VERSION macro).
-- 
2.37.2




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux