On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 12:51:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This program exercises metadump and mdrestore being run against the
> scratch device. Therefore, the test must pass external log / rt device
> arguments to xfs_repair -n to check the "restored" filesystem. Fix the
> incorrect usage, and report repair failures, since this test has been
> silently failing for a while now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tests/xfs/432 | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/432 b/tests/xfs/432
> index 86012f0b..5c6744ce 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/432
> +++ b/tests/xfs/432
> @@ -89,7 +89,16 @@ _scratch_xfs_metadump $metadump_file -w
> xfs_mdrestore $metadump_file $metadump_img
>
> echo "Check restored metadump image"
> -$XFS_REPAIR_PROG -n $metadump_img >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +repair_args=('-n')
> +[ "$USE_EXTERNAL" = yes -a ! -z "$SCRATCH_LOGDEV" ] && \
> + repair_args+=('-l' "$SCRATCH_LOGDEV")
> +
> +[ "$USE_EXTERNAL" = yes -a ! -z "$SCRATCH_RTDEV" ] && \
> + repair_args+=('-r' "$SCRATCH_RTDEV")
> +
> +$XFS_REPAIR_PROG "${repair_args[@]}" $metadump_img >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +res=$?
> +test $res -ne 0 && echo "xfs_repair on restored fs returned $res?"
Make sense to me, I don't have better idea. One question, is xfs_metadump
and xfs_mdrestore support rtdev? Due to I didn't find xfs_metadump have
a "-r" option, although it has "-l logdev" :)
About the "$res", I don't know why we need this extra variable, as it's
not used in other place.
Thanks,
Zorro
>
> # success, all done
> status=0
>
