On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:08:38PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> (just FYI for the possible performance impact of disabling large folios,
> our config, as attached, set default N to XFS_LARGE_FOLIOS)
>
>
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -91.7% regression of vm-scalability.throughput due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 345a4666a721a81c343186768cdd95817767195f ("xfs: disable large folios except for developers")
Say what? I've never seen that change go past on a public list...
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfs-linux.git xfs-5.20-merge
Oh, it's in a developer's working tree, not something that has been
proposed for review let alone been merged.
So why is this report being sent to lkml, linux-xfs, etc as if it
was a change merged into an upstream tree rather than just the
developer who owns the tree the commit is in?
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
