Am Mo., 11. Juli 2022 um 06:16 Uhr schrieb Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>:
> ->writepage is only used for single page writeback from memory reclaim,
> and not called at all for cgroup writeback. Follow the lead of XFS
> and remove ->writepage and rely entirely on ->writepages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/gfs2/aops.c | 26 --------------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/aops.c b/fs/gfs2/aops.c
> index 106e90a365838..0240a1a717f56 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/aops.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/aops.c
> @@ -81,31 +81,6 @@ static int gfs2_get_block_noalloc(struct inode *inode, sector_t lblock,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * gfs2_writepage - Write page for writeback mappings
> - * @page: The page
> - * @wbc: The writeback control
> - */
> -static int gfs2_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> -{
> - struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> - struct gfs2_inode *ip = GFS2_I(inode);
> - struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = GFS2_SB(inode);
> - struct iomap_writepage_ctx wpc = { };
> -
> - if (gfs2_assert_withdraw(sdp, gfs2_glock_is_held_excl(ip->i_gl)))
> - goto out;
> - if (current->journal_info)
> - goto redirty;
> - return iomap_writepage(page, wbc, &wpc, &gfs2_writeback_ops);
> -
> -redirty:
> - redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
> -out:
> - unlock_page(page);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * gfs2_write_jdata_page - gfs2 jdata-specific version of block_write_full_page
> * @page: The page to write
> @@ -765,7 +740,6 @@ bool gfs2_release_folio(struct folio *folio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> }
>
> static const struct address_space_operations gfs2_aops = {
> - .writepage = gfs2_writepage,
> .writepages = gfs2_writepages,
> .read_folio = gfs2_read_folio,
> .readahead = gfs2_readahead,
> --
> 2.30.2
>
This is looking fine, and it has survived a moderate amount of testing already.
Tested-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx>
It should be possible to remove the .writepage operation in
gfs2_jdata_aops as well, but I must be overlooking something because
that actually breaks things.
Thanks,
Andreas
