On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 03:48:42PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We're about to make this logic do a bit more, so convert the macro to a > static inline function for better typechecking and fewer shouty macros. > No functional changes here. No arguments about the inline which is always a good idea. But is there much of a point in changing the naming? The old one nicely sticks out just like XFS_I and VFS_I have been inline functions for a long time.
