Re: [PATCH 5.10 CANDIDATE v2 0/7] xfs stable candidate patches for 5.10.y (from v5.13)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 7:20 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:33:04AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a resend of the series that was posted 3 weeks ago [v1].
> > The backports in this series are from circa v5.12..v5.13.
> > The remaining queue of tested 5.10 backports [1] contains 25 more patches
> > from v5.13..v5.19-rc1.
> >
> > There have been no comments on the first post except for Dave's request
> > to collaborate the backports review process with Leah who had earlier
> > sent out another series of backports for 5.15.y.
> >
> > Following Dave's request, I had put this series a side to collaborate
> > the shared review of 5.15/5.10 series with Leah and now that the shared
> > series has been posted to stable, I am re-posting to request ACKs on this
> > 5.10.y specific series.
> >
> > There are four user visible fixes in this series, one patch for dependency
> > ("rename variable mp") and two patches to improve testability of LTS.
>
> Aha, I had wondered why the journal_info thing was in this branch, and
> if that would even fit under the usual stable rules...
>
> > Specifically, I selected the fix ("use current->journal_info for
> > detecting transaction recursion") after I got a false positive assert
> > while testing LTS kernel with XFS_DEBUG and at another incident, it
> > helped me triage a regression that would have been harder to trace
> > back to the offending code otherwise.
>
> ...but clearly maintainers have been hitting this, so that's ok by /me/ to
> have it.  If nothing else, XFS doesn't support nested transactions, so any
> weird stuff that falls out was already a dangerous bug.

Exactly.

>
> Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>

I am not going to post this to xfs list again with Acked-by
before posting to stable, because this is the second posting
already with no changes since v1.

I am going to wait until Greg picks up the already posted series
for 5.10 and 5.15 - it looks like he is also on vacation...

Thanks!
Amir.



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux