On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:43:29AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ typedef struct xfs_inode {
> uint64_t i_diflags2; /* XFS_DIFLAG2_... */
> struct timespec64 i_crtime; /* time created */
>
> + /* unlinked list pointers */
> + xfs_agino_t i_next_unlinked;
The placement here seems unfortunate as it grows the inode vs just
filling holes. I think placing it before i_ioend_lock might work
better, but a little pahole evaluation might be a good idea.
