Re: [PATCH 5.10 CANDIDATE 03/11] xfs: Fix the free logic of state in xfs_attr_node_hasname

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 09:46:29PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 7:32 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:06:33PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > > From: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > commit a1de97fe296c52eafc6590a3506f4bbd44ecb19a upstream.
> > >
> > > When testing xfstests xfs/126 on lastest upstream kernel, it will hang on some machine.
> > > Adding a getxattr operation after xattr corrupted, I can reproduce it 100%.
> > >
> > > The deadlock as below:
> > > [983.923403] task:setfattr        state:D stack:    0 pid:17639 ppid: 14687 flags:0x00000080
> > > [  983.923405] Call Trace:
> > > [  983.923410]  __schedule+0x2c4/0x700
> > > [  983.923412]  schedule+0x37/0xa0
> > > [  983.923414]  schedule_timeout+0x274/0x300
> > > [  983.923416]  __down+0x9b/0xf0
> > > [  983.923451]  ? xfs_buf_find.isra.29+0x3c8/0x5f0 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923453]  down+0x3b/0x50
> > > [  983.923471]  xfs_buf_lock+0x33/0xf0 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923490]  xfs_buf_find.isra.29+0x3c8/0x5f0 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923508]  xfs_buf_get_map+0x4c/0x320 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923525]  xfs_buf_read_map+0x53/0x310 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923541]  ? xfs_da_read_buf+0xcf/0x120 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923560]  xfs_trans_read_buf_map+0x1cf/0x360 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923575]  ? xfs_da_read_buf+0xcf/0x120 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923590]  xfs_da_read_buf+0xcf/0x120 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923606]  xfs_da3_node_read+0x1f/0x40 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923621]  xfs_da3_node_lookup_int+0x69/0x4a0 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923624]  ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x12e/0x270
> > > [  983.923637]  xfs_attr_node_hasname+0x6e/0xa0 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923651]  xfs_has_attr+0x6e/0xd0 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923664]  xfs_attr_set+0x273/0x320 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923683]  xfs_xattr_set+0x87/0xd0 [xfs]
> > > [  983.923686]  __vfs_removexattr+0x4d/0x60
> > > [  983.923688]  __vfs_removexattr_locked+0xac/0x130
> > > [  983.923689]  vfs_removexattr+0x4e/0xf0
> > > [  983.923690]  removexattr+0x4d/0x80
> > > [  983.923693]  ? __check_object_size+0xa8/0x16b
> > > [  983.923695]  ? strncpy_from_user+0x47/0x1a0
> > > [  983.923696]  ? getname_flags+0x6a/0x1e0
> > > [  983.923697]  ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > > [  983.923699]  ? __sb_start_write+0x1e/0x70
> > > [  983.923700]  ? mnt_want_write+0x28/0x50
> > > [  983.923701]  path_removexattr+0x9b/0xb0
> > > [  983.923702]  __x64_sys_removexattr+0x17/0x20
> > > [  983.923704]  do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1a0
> > > [  983.923705]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
> > > [  983.923707] RIP: 0033:0x7f080f10ee1b
> > >
> > > When getxattr calls xfs_attr_node_get function, xfs_da3_node_lookup_int fails with EFSCORRUPTED in
> > > xfs_attr_node_hasname because we have use blocktrash to random it in xfs/126. So it
> > > free state in internal and xfs_attr_node_get doesn't do xfs_buf_trans release job.
> > >
> > > Then subsequent removexattr will hang because of it.
> > >
> > > This bug was introduced by kernel commit 07120f1abdff ("xfs: Add xfs_has_attr and subroutines").
> > > It adds xfs_attr_node_hasname helper and said caller will be responsible for freeing the state
> > > in this case. But xfs_attr_node_hasname will free state itself instead of caller if
> > > xfs_da3_node_lookup_int fails.
> > >
> > > Fix this bug by moving the step of free state into caller.
> > >
> > > [amir: this text from original commit is not relevant for 5.10 backport:
> > > Also, use "goto error/out" instead of returning error directly in xfs_attr_node_addname_find_attr and
> > > xfs_attr_node_removename_setup function because we should free state ourselves.
> > > ]
> > >
> > > Fixes: 07120f1abdff ("xfs: Add xfs_has_attr and subroutines")
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 13 +++++--------
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> > > index 96ac7e562b87..fcca36bbd997 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> > > @@ -876,21 +876,18 @@ xfs_attr_node_hasname(
> > >
> > >       state = xfs_da_state_alloc(args);
> > >       if (statep != NULL)
> > > -             *statep = NULL;
> > > +             *statep = state;
> > >
> > >       /*
> > >        * Search to see if name exists, and get back a pointer to it.
> > >        */
> > >       error = xfs_da3_node_lookup_int(state, &retval);
> > > -     if (error) {
> > > -             xfs_da_state_free(state);
> > > -             return error;
> > > -     }
> > > +     if (error)
> > > +             retval = error;
> > >
> > > -     if (statep != NULL)
> > > -             *statep = state;
> > > -     else
> > > +     if (!statep)
> > >               xfs_da_state_free(state);
> > > +
> > >       return retval;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > Curious -- the conversion of the _node_hasname callers isn't in this
> > patch.  Looking at 5.10.124, I see that most of the callers already
> > clean up the passed-out statep, but do the callers of xfs_has_attr free
> > it too?
> 
> Is that a trick question or am I misunderstanding it :)
> 
> xfs_has_attr() passes NULL as xfs_attr_node_hasname()
> statep argument... they don't get the state back.

Nope, just misreading the code.  I guess this looks fine.

--D

> Thanks,
> Amir.



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux