Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/15] xfs stable candidate patches for 5.15.y

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 11:38:35AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 6:53 AM Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Leah Rumancik <lrumancik@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This first round of patches aims to take care of the easy cases - patches
> > with the Fixes tag that apply cleanly. I have ~30 more patches identified
> > which will be tested next, thanks everyone for the various suggestions
> > for tracking down more bug fixes. No regressions were seen during
> > testing when running fstests 3 times per config with the following configs:
> 
> Hi Leah!
> 
> I'll let the xfs developers comment on the individual patches.
> General comments about stable process and collaboration.
> 
> Some of the patches in this series are relevant to 5.10 and even apply
> cleanly to 5.10 (see below).
> They are in my queue but I did not get to test them thoroughly yet,
> because I am working chronologically.
> 
> To avoid misunderstanding with stable maintainers, when you post to
> stable, please make sure to state clearly in the cover letter that those
> patches have only been tested on 5.15.y and should only be applied
> to 5.15.y.
> I know you have 5.15 in subject, but I would rather be safe than sorry.

Fair concern, will do.

> 
> Luis has advised me to post up to 10 patches in each round.
> The rationale is that after we test and patches are applied to stable
> regressions may be detected and reported by downstream users.
> 
> Regressions will be easier to bisect if there are less fixes in every
> LTS release. For this reason, I am holding on to my part 2 patches
> until 5.10.120 is released. LTS releases are usually on weekly basis
> so the delay is not much.
> 
> I don't think that this series is terribly big, so I am fine with you
> posting it at one go, but please consider splitting it pre 5.16
> and post 5.16 or any other way that you see fit when you post
> to stable, but let's wait for xfs developers review - if they tell you to
> drop a few patches my comment will become moot ;-)
> 

Sure, that is no problem for me, I'll go ahead and split into sets of 10
or fewer.

Thanks for the comments!
Leah



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux