Re: [PATCH] generic/623: fix test for runing on overlayfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 02:29:05PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> For this test to run on overlayfs we open a different file to perform
> shutdown+fsync while keeping the writeback target file open.
> 
> We should probably perform fsync on the writeback target file, but
> the bug is reproduced on xfs and overlayfs+xfs also as is.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Zorro,
> 
> I tested that this test passes for both xfs and overlayfs+xfs on v5.18
> and tested that both configs fail with the same warning on v5.10.109.
> 
> I tried changing fsync to syncfs for the test to be more correct in the
> overlayfs case, but then golden output of xfs and overlayfs+xfs differ
> and that would need some more output filtering (or disregarding output
> completely).
> 
> Since this minimal change does the job and does not change test behavior
> on xfs on any of the tested kernels, I thought it might be good enough.
> 
> Thanks,
> Amir.
> 
>  tests/generic/623 | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/623 b/tests/generic/623
> index ea016d91..bb36ad25 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/623
> +++ b/tests/generic/623
> @@ -24,10 +24,13 @@ _scratch_mount
>  # XFS had a regression where it failed to check shutdown status in the fault
>  # path. This produced an iomap warning because writeback failure clears Uptodate
>  # status on the page.
> +# For this test to run on overlayfs we open a different file to perform
> +# shutdown+fsync while keeping the writeback target file open.
>  file=$SCRATCH_MNT/file
>  $XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite 0 4k" -c fsync $file | _filter_xfs_io
>  ulimit -c 0
> -$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "mmap 0 4k" -c "mwrite 0 4k" -c shutdown -c fsync \
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "mmap 0 4k" -c "mwrite 0 4k" \
> +	-c "open $(_scratch_shutdown_handle)" -c shutdown -c fsync \

Did you try to reproduce the original bug which this test case covers?

According to the "man xfs_io":

       open [[ -acdfrstRTPL ] path ]
              Closes the current file, and opens the file specified by path instead. Without any arguments, displays statistics about the current file - see the stat command.

Although I doubt if it always real close the current file, but you open to get
a new file descriptor, later operations will base on new fd. I don't know if
it still has original testing coverage.

I'd like to help this case to support overlay, presuppose original fs
testing isn't changed. Or it's not worth.

Welcome more review points from the author of this case and others.

Thanks,
Zorro

>  	-c "mwrite 0 4k" $file | _filter_xfs_io
>  
>  # success, all done
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux