On 5/5/22 11:08 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > If we decide to restart an inode chunk walk because one of the inodes is > stale, make sure that we don't walk an inode that's been scanned before. > This ensure we always make forward progress. > > Found by observing backwards inode scan progress while running xfs/285. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> Would you mind if I nitpicked a: /* ensure forward progress if we retried */ comment above the inode number test before I commit? Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
