On Sun, 2022-05-15 at 20:37 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > XFS has the unique behavior (as compared to the other Linux filesystems) > that on writeback errors it will completely invalidate the affected > folio and force the page cache to reread the contents from disk. All > other filesystems leave the page mapped and up to date. > > This is a rude awakening for user programs, since (in the case where > write fails but reread doesn't) file contents will appear to revert to > old disk contents with no notification other than an EIO on fsync. This > might have been annoying back in the days when iomap dealt with one page > at a time, but with multipage folios, we can now throw away *megabytes* > worth of data for a single write error. > > On *most* Linux filesystems, a program can respond to an EIO on write by > redirtying the entire file and scheduling it for writeback. This isn't > foolproof, since the page that failed writeback is no longer dirty and > could be evicted, but programs that want to recover properly *also* > have to detect XFS and regenerate every write they've made to the file. > > When running xfs/314 on arm64, I noticed a UAF bug when xfs_discard_folio > invalidates multipage folios that could be undergoing writeback. If, > say, we have a 256K folio caching a mix of written and unwritten > extents, it's possible that we could start writeback of the first (say) > 64K of the folio and then hit a writeback error on the next 64K. We > then free the iop attached to the folio, which is really bad because > writeback completion on the first 64k will trip over the "blocks per > folio > 1 && !iop" assertion. > > This can't be fixed by only invalidating the folio if writeback fails at > the start of the folio, since the folio is marked !uptodate, which trips > other assertions elsewhere. Get rid of the whole behavior entirely. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 1 - > fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 4 +--- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > index 8fb9b2797fc5..94b53cbdefad 100644 > --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > @@ -1387,7 +1387,6 @@ iomap_writepage_map(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, > if (wpc->ops->discard_folio) > wpc->ops->discard_folio(folio, pos); > if (!count) { > - folio_clear_uptodate(folio); > folio_unlock(folio); > goto done; > } > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > index 90b7f4d127de..f6216d0fb0c2 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ xfs_discard_folio( > int error; > > if (xfs_is_shutdown(mp)) > - goto out_invalidate; > + return; > > xfs_alert_ratelimited(mp, > "page discard on page "PTR_FMT", inode 0x%llx, pos %llu.", > @@ -474,8 +474,6 @@ xfs_discard_folio( > i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio) - pageoff_fsb); > if (error && !xfs_is_shutdown(mp)) > xfs_alert(mp, "page discard unable to remove delalloc mapping."); > -out_invalidate: > - iomap_invalidate_folio(folio, offset, folio_size(folio) - offset); > } > > static const struct iomap_writeback_ops xfs_writeback_ops = { Nice to start bringing some consistency to this behavior across the kernel! Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>