On 4/6/2022 10:30 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 05:32:31PM +0000, Jane Chu wrote: >> Yes, I believe Dan was motivated by avoiding the dm dance as a result of >> adding .recovery_write to dax_operations. >> >> I understand your point about .recovery_write is device specific and >> thus not something appropriate for device agnostic ops. >> >> I can see 2 options so far - >> >> 1) add .recovery_write to dax_operations and do the dm dance to hunt >> down to the base device that actually provides the recovery action > > That would be my preference. But I'll wait for Dan to chime in. Okay. > >> Okay, will run the checkpatch.pl test again. > > Unfortuntely checkpatch.pl is broken in that regard. It treats the > exception to occasionally go longer or readability as the default. I see. thanks, -jane
