On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 01:06:56PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote: > I did it like this initially but it appeared to me that the diff was > messy. As there were many &d -> d and report_mount -> > get_quota/report_mount replacements, so I split it. But I'm not > against reshaping this back, should I do it? Well, a large part of this series is churn and we can't do much about it. To me doing the changes together seems more logical, but in the end either way is fine, so feel free to do it the way you prefer.
