Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update IOMAP FILESYSTEM LIBRARY and XFS FILESYSTEM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:55:39PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/12/2022 11:50 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 08:39:17PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:21:26AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> > > > Remove the following section entries of IOMAP FILESYSTEM LIBRARY:
> > > > 
> > > > M:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > M:	linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > 
> > > > Remove the following section entry of XFS FILESYSTEM:
> > > > 
> > > > M:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > WTF?
> > > 
> > >  ▄▄   ▄   ▄▄   ▄    ▄
> > >  █▀▄  █   ██   █  ▄▀
> > >  █ █▄ █  █  █  █▄█
> > >  █  █ █  █▄▄█  █  █▄
> > >  █   ██ █    █ █   ▀▄
> > 
> > *OH*, I see, you're getting rid of the M(ail): entry, probably because
> > it's redundant with L(ist): or something??  Still... why does it matter?
> 
> Yes, the section entries are redundant. Sorry for the unclear description.
> 
> The intention of this patch is to clean up the redundant section entries.
> 
> > 
> > Seriously, changelogs need to say /why/ they're changing something, not
> > simply restate what's already in the diff.
> 
> OK, thank you. Should I send a v2 patch to update the commit message
> or just ignore this patch?

Yes, please send a v2 patch with an improved commit message.  NAK
withdrawn.

--D

> Thanks,
> Tiezhu
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux