https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215804 --- Comment #4 from Zorro Lang (zlang@xxxxxxxxxx) --- (In reply to Dave Chinner from comment #3) > Hi Zorro, > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 04:44:35AM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215804 > > > > Bug ID: 215804 > > Summary: [xfstests generic/670] Unable to handle kernel paging > > request at virtual address fffffbffff000008 > > Product: File System > > Version: 2.5 > > Kernel Version: xfs-5.18-merge-4 > > Hardware: All > > OS: Linux > > Tree: Mainline > > Status: NEW > > Severity: normal > > Priority: P1 > > Component: XFS > > Assignee: filesystem_xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Reporter: zlang@xxxxxxxxxx > > Regression: No > > > > xfstests generic/670 hit a panic[1] on 64k directory block size XFS > (mkfs.xfs > > -n size=65536 -m rmapbt=1 -b size=1024): > ..... > > [37285.246770] Call trace: > > [37285.246952] __split_huge_pmd+0x1d8/0x34c > > [37285.247246] split_huge_pmd_address+0x10c/0x1a0 > > [37285.247577] try_to_unmap_one+0xb64/0x125c > > [37285.247878] rmap_walk_file+0x1dc/0x4b0 > > [37285.248159] try_to_unmap+0x134/0x16c > > [37285.248427] split_huge_page_to_list+0x5ec/0xcbc > > [37285.248763] truncate_inode_partial_folio+0x194/0x2ec > > [37285.249128] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x2e8/0x870 > > [37285.249483] truncate_pagecache_range+0xa0/0xc0 > > That doesn't look like an XFS regression, more likely a bug in the > new large folios in the page cache feature. Can you revert commit > 6795801366da ("xfs: Support large folios") and see if the problem > goes away? Sure, I'm going to test that, thanks! > > Cheers, > > Dave. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
