Re: [PATCH V8 08/19] xfs: Introduce XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NREXT64 and associated per-fs feature bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 08:37:19AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:47:39AM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> > XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NREXT64 incompat feature bit will be set on filesystems
> > which support large per-inode extent counters. This commit defines the new
> > incompat feature bit and the corresponding per-fs feature bit (along with
> > inline functions to work on it).
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h | 1 +
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c     | 3 +++
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h         | 2 ++
> >  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > index b5e9256d6d32..64ff0c310696 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > @@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ xfs_sb_has_ro_compat_feature(
> >  #define XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_META_UUID	(1 << 2)	/* metadata UUID */
> >  #define XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_BIGTIME	(1 << 3)	/* large timestamps */
> >  #define XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NEEDSREPAIR (1 << 4)	/* needs xfs_repair */
> > +#define XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NREXT64	(1 << 5)	/* large extent counters */
> >  #define XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ALL \
> >  		(XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_FTYPE|	\
> >  		 XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_SPINODES|	\
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > index f4e84aa1d50a..bd632389ae92 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> > @@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ xfs_sb_version_to_features(
> >  		features |= XFS_FEAT_BIGTIME;
> >  	if (sbp->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NEEDSREPAIR)
> >  		features |= XFS_FEAT_NEEDSREPAIR;
> > +	if (sbp->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NREXT64)
> > +		features |= XFS_FEAT_NREXT64;
> > +
> 
> Shouldn't enabling the feature be the last patch in the series, once
> all the infrastructure to support the feature is in place? i.e. if
> someone does a bisect on a XFS_FEAT_NREXT64 enabled filesystem, they
> can land in the middle of this series where the fs tries to use
> XFS_FEAT_NREXT64 but the functionality is not complete.

The last patch of the series does exactly that, by adding NREXT64 to
XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ALL.

--D

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux