On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure if this is known and/or fixed already, but it didn't look > familiar so here is a report. I hit a splat when testing Willy's > prospective folio bookmark change and it turns out it replicates on > Linus' current master (551acdc3c3d2). This initially reproduced on > xfs/264 (mkfs defaults) and I saw a soft lockup warning variant via > xfs/006, but when I attempted to reproduce the latter a second time I > hit what looks like the same problem as xfs/264. Both tests seem to > involve some form of error injection, so possibly the same underlying > problem. The GPF splat from xfs/264 is below. On a side note, I'm wondering if we should add xfs/006 and xfs/264 to the recoveryloop group - they do a shutdown under load and a followup mount to ensure the filesystem gets recovered before the test ends and the fs is checked, so while thy don't explicitly test recovery, they do exercise it.... Thoughts? -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
