On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 06:29:26PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reorganize struct xchk_btree so that we can dynamically size the context
> structure to fit the type of btree cursor that we have. This will
> enable us to use memory more efficiently once we start adding very tall
> btree types.
So bs->levels[0].has_lastkey replaces bs->firstkey? Can you explain
a bit more how this works for someone not too familiar with the scrub
code.
> +static inline size_t
> +xchk_btree_sizeof(unsigned int levels)
> +{
> + return sizeof(struct xchk_btree) +
> + (levels * sizeof(struct xchk_btree_levels));
This should probably use struct_size().
