On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 11:29:16AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > As it is, my longer term plan it to actually properly support things > like spinlocks, atomics, rcu, etc in xfsprogs via pthread and > liburcu wrappers defined in include/<foo.h> that are xfsprogs wide. > At that point, the wrappers in libxfs/libxfs_priv.h then simply > disappear. > > I'd prefer we move towards proper support for these primitives > rather than just rearranging how we mock them up... Just dug some patches out of a series (not up to date so probably won't apply, but...) so you can see what I'm suggesting. I'll post them as a reply here... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
