On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:07:01PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Now that we have made the inactivation of unlinked inodes a background > task to increase the throughput of file deletions, we need to be a > little more careful about how long of a delay we can tolerate. > > Specifically, if the dquots attached to the inode being inactivated are > nearing any kind of enforcement boundary, we want to queue that > inactivation work immediately so that users don't get EDQUOT/ENOSPC > errors even after they deleted a bunch of files to stay within quota. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.h | 10 ++++++++++ > fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 10 ++++++++++ > fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h | 2 ++ > 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+) Looks good. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
