On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:06:44PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > If we don't need to inactivate an inode, we can detach the dquots and > move on to reclamation. This isn't strictly required here; it's a > preparation patch for deferred inactivation per reviewer request[1] to > move the creation of xfs_inode_needs_inactivation into a separate > change. Eventually this !need_inactive chunk will turn into the code > path for inodes that skip xfs_inactive and go straight to memory > reclaim. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20210609012838.GW2945738@locust/T/#mca6d958521cb88bbc1bfe1a30767203328d410b5 > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> LGTM. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
