On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 07:48:38AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > We should avoid namespace conflicts where function names shadow > object types. iomap_iterate() is fine as the function name - there's > no need for abbreviation here because it's not an overly long name. > This will makes it clearly different to the struct iomap_iter that > is passed to it and it will also make grep, cscope and other > code searching tools much more precise... Well, there isn't really a conflict by definition. I actually like this choice of names (stolen from the original patch from willy) as it clearly indicates they go together. But I'm happy to collect a few more opinions.
