On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:01:05AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:23 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Make sure that the needsrepair feature flag can be cleared only by
> > repair and that mounts are prohibited when the feature is set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > common/xfs | 28 ++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/xfs/768 | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/xfs/768.out | 4 +++
> > tests/xfs/770 | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/xfs/770.out | 2 +
> > tests/xfs/group | 2 +
> > 6 files changed, 199 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/768
> > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/768.out
> > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/770
> > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/770.out
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
> > index 887bd001..c2384146 100644
> > --- a/common/xfs
> > +++ b/common/xfs
> > @@ -312,6 +312,13 @@ _scratch_xfs_check()
> > _xfs_check $SCRATCH_OPTIONS $* $SCRATCH_DEV
> > }
> >
> > +_require_libxfs_debug_flag() {
> > + local hook="$1"
> > +
> > + grep -q LIBXFS_DEBUG_WRITE_CRASH "$(type -P xfs_repair)" || \
> > + _notrun "libxfs debug hook $hook not detected?"
>
> You ignored the $hook arg.
> And this is a bit of a strange test.
Doh. Will fix; thanks for noticing that. :)
> In _require_unionmount_testsuite() I also pass env vars to the test utility
> and I made it so the usage message will print the non empty env vars
> passed to the programm.
>
> I can understand if nothing like that was done for xfs_repair and you want
> this test to work with an already released version of xfs_repair, but if that
> test is against a pre-released version of xfs_repair, I suggest to make it
> more friendly for _require check.
That would have been a good idea, but we already shipped this in 5.11.
:/
--D
> Thanks,
> Amir.
