Re: [PATCH 7/9] generic/620: fix order of require_scratch calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:05:14PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> _require_scratch_16T_support does not itself check that the scratch
> device exists, which means that it depends on someone else to call
> _require_scratch.  Document this dependency and fix this test so that we
> can run:
> 
> ./check --exact-order generic/374 generic/620
> 
> on an ext4 filesystem without g/620 tripping over the mess left by g/374
> when it calls _notrun.

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux