Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] xfs: set a mount flag when perag reservation is active

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 09:30:58AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> perag reservation is enabled at mount time on a per AG basis. The
> upcoming in-core allocation btree accounting mechanism needs to know
> when reservation is enabled and that all perag AGF contexts are
> initialized. As a preparation step, set a flag in the mount
> structure and unconditionally initialize the pagf on all mounts
> where at least one reservation is active.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag_resv.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h          |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag_resv.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag_resv.c
> index 6c5f8d10589c..9b2fc4abad2c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag_resv.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ag_resv.c
> @@ -254,6 +254,7 @@ xfs_ag_resv_init(
>  	xfs_extlen_t			ask;
>  	xfs_extlen_t			used;
>  	int				error = 0;
> +	bool				has_resv = false;
>  
>  	/* Create the metadata reservation. */
>  	if (pag->pag_meta_resv.ar_asked == 0) {
> @@ -291,6 +292,8 @@ xfs_ag_resv_init(
>  			if (error)
>  				goto out;
>  		}
> +		if (ask)
> +			has_resv = true;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Create the RMAPBT metadata reservation */
> @@ -304,18 +307,19 @@ xfs_ag_resv_init(
>  		error = __xfs_ag_resv_init(pag, XFS_AG_RESV_RMAPBT, ask, used);
>  		if (error)
>  			goto out;
> +		if (ask)
> +			has_resv = true;
>  	}
>  
> -#ifdef DEBUG
> -	/* need to read in the AGF for the ASSERT below to work */
> -	error = xfs_alloc_pagf_init(pag->pag_mount, tp, pag->pag_agno, 0);
> -	if (error)
> -		return error;
> -
> -	ASSERT(xfs_perag_resv(pag, XFS_AG_RESV_METADATA)->ar_reserved +
> -	       xfs_perag_resv(pag, XFS_AG_RESV_RMAPBT)->ar_reserved <=
> -	       pag->pagf_freeblks + pag->pagf_flcount);
> -#endif
> +	if (has_resv) {
> +		mp->m_has_agresv = true;

If the metadata reservation succeeds but the rmapbt reservation fails
with ENOSPC, won't we fail to set m_has_agresv true here?  We don't fail
the entire mount if ENOSPC happens, which means that there's a slight
chance of doing the wrong thing here if all the AGs are (somehow) like
that.

--D

> +		error = xfs_alloc_pagf_init(mp, tp, pag->pag_agno, 0);
> +		if (error)
> +			return error;
> +		ASSERT(xfs_perag_resv(pag, XFS_AG_RESV_METADATA)->ar_reserved +
> +		       xfs_perag_resv(pag, XFS_AG_RESV_RMAPBT)->ar_reserved <=
> +		       pag->pagf_freeblks + pag->pagf_flcount);
> +	}
>  out:
>  	return error;
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> index 81829d19596e..8847ffd29777 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
>  	bool			m_fail_unmount;
>  	bool			m_finobt_nores; /* no per-AG finobt resv. */
>  	bool			m_update_sb;	/* sb needs update in mount */
> +	bool			m_has_agresv;	/* perag reservations active */
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Bitsets of per-fs metadata that have been checked and/or are sick.
> -- 
> 2.26.3
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux