On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:33:05PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
> This patch hoists xfs_attr_leaf_addname into the calling function. The
> goal being to get all the code that will require state management into
> the same scope. This isn't particuarly aesthetic right away, but it is a
> preliminary step to merging in the state machine code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 209 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> index 5b5410f..16f10ac 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
...
> @@ -729,115 +821,6 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_try_add(
> return retval;
> }
>
> -
> -/*
> - * Add a name to the leaf attribute list structure
> - *
> - * This leaf block cannot have a "remote" value, we only call this routine
> - * if bmap_one_block() says there is only one block (ie: no remote blks).
> - */
> -STATIC int
> -xfs_attr_leaf_addname(
> - struct xfs_da_args *args)
> -{
> - int error, forkoff;
> - struct xfs_buf *bp = NULL;
> - struct xfs_inode *dp = args->dp;
> -
> - trace_xfs_attr_leaf_addname(args);
> -
Did this tracepoint disappear for a reason?
Brian
> - error = xfs_attr_leaf_try_add(args, bp);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> -
> - /*
> - * Commit the transaction that added the attr name so that
> - * later routines can manage their own transactions.
> - */
> - error = xfs_trans_roll_inode(&args->trans, dp);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> -
> - /*
> - * If there was an out-of-line value, allocate the blocks we
> - * identified for its storage and copy the value. This is done
> - * after we create the attribute so that we don't overflow the
> - * maximum size of a transaction and/or hit a deadlock.
> - */
> - if (args->rmtblkno > 0) {
> - error = xfs_attr_rmtval_set(args);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> - }
> -
> - if (!(args->op_flags & XFS_DA_OP_RENAME)) {
> - /*
> - * Added a "remote" value, just clear the incomplete flag.
> - */
> - if (args->rmtblkno > 0)
> - error = xfs_attr3_leaf_clearflag(args);
> -
> - return error;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * If this is an atomic rename operation, we must "flip" the incomplete
> - * flags on the "new" and "old" attribute/value pairs so that one
> - * disappears and one appears atomically. Then we must remove the "old"
> - * attribute/value pair.
> - *
> - * In a separate transaction, set the incomplete flag on the "old" attr
> - * and clear the incomplete flag on the "new" attr.
> - */
> -
> - error = xfs_attr3_leaf_flipflags(args);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> - /*
> - * Commit the flag value change and start the next trans in series.
> - */
> - error = xfs_trans_roll_inode(&args->trans, args->dp);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> -
> - /*
> - * Dismantle the "old" attribute/value pair by removing a "remote" value
> - * (if it exists).
> - */
> - xfs_attr_restore_rmt_blk(args);
> -
> - if (args->rmtblkno) {
> - error = xfs_attr_rmtval_invalidate(args);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> -
> - error = xfs_attr_rmtval_remove(args);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Read in the block containing the "old" attr, then remove the "old"
> - * attr from that block (neat, huh!)
> - */
> - error = xfs_attr3_leaf_read(args->trans, args->dp, args->blkno,
> - &bp);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> -
> - xfs_attr3_leaf_remove(bp, args);
> -
> - /*
> - * If the result is small enough, shrink it all into the inode.
> - */
> - forkoff = xfs_attr_shortform_allfit(bp, dp);
> - if (forkoff)
> - error = xfs_attr3_leaf_to_shortform(bp, args, forkoff);
> - /* bp is gone due to xfs_da_shrink_inode */
> -
> - return error;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Return EEXIST if attr is found, or ENOATTR if not
> */
> --
> 2.7.4
>
