On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:11 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Test that we can upgrade an existing filesystem to use bigtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> common/xfs | 13 +++++
> tests/xfs/908 | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/908.out | 20 +++++++
> tests/xfs/909 | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/909.out | 6 ++
> tests/xfs/group | 2 +
> 6 files changed, 287 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/908
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/908.out
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/909
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/909.out
>
>
> diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
> index 37658788..c430b3ac 100644
> --- a/common/xfs
> +++ b/common/xfs
> @@ -1152,3 +1152,16 @@ _xfs_timestamp_range()
> awk '{printf("%s %s", $1, $2);}'
> fi
> }
> +
> +_require_xfs_scratch_bigtime()
> +{
> + _require_scratch
> +
> + _scratch_mkfs -m bigtime=1 &>/dev/null || \
> + _notrun "mkfs.xfs doesn't have bigtime feature"
> + _try_scratch_mount || \
> + _notrun "bigtime not supported by scratch filesystem type: $FSTYP"
> + $XFS_INFO_PROG "$SCRATCH_MNT" | grep -q "bigtime=1" || \
> + _notrun "bigtime feature not advertised on mount?"
> + _scratch_unmount
> +}
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/908 b/tests/xfs/908
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..1ad3131a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/908
> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +# Copyright (c) 2021 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. 908
> +#
> +# Check that we can upgrade a filesystem to support bigtime and that inode
> +# timestamps work properly after the upgrade.
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1 # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + cd /
> + rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_require_command "$XFS_ADMIN_PROG" "xfs_admin"
> +_require_xfs_scratch_bigtime
> +_require_xfs_repair_upgrade bigtime
> +
> +date --date='Jan 1 00:00:00 UTC 2040' > /dev/null 2>&1 || \
> + _notrun "Userspace does not support dates past 2038."
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# Make sure we can't upgrade a V4 filesystem
> +_scratch_mkfs -m crc=0 >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_xfs_admin -O bigtime=1 2>> $seqres.full
> +_check_scratch_xfs_features BIGTIME
> +
> +# Make sure we're required to specify a feature status
> +_scratch_mkfs -m crc=1,bigtime=0,inobtcount=0 >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_xfs_admin -O bigtime 2>> $seqres.full
> +
> +# Can we add bigtime and inobtcount at the same time?
> +_scratch_mkfs -m crc=1,bigtime=0,inobtcount=0 >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_xfs_admin -O bigtime=1,inobtcount=1 2>> $seqres.full
> +
> +# Format V5 filesystem without bigtime support and populate it
> +_scratch_mkfs -m crc=1,bigtime=0 >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_xfs_db -c 'version' -c 'sb 0' -c 'p' >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
> +
> +touch -d 'Jan 9 19:19:19 UTC 1999' $SCRATCH_MNT/a
> +touch -d 'Jan 9 19:19:19 UTC 1999' $SCRATCH_MNT/b
> +ls -la $SCRATCH_MNT/* >> $seqres.full
> +
> +echo before upgrade:
> +TZ=UTC stat -c '%Y' $SCRATCH_MNT/a
> +TZ=UTC stat -c '%Y' $SCRATCH_MNT/b
> +
> +_scratch_unmount
> +_check_scratch_fs
> +
> +# Now upgrade to bigtime support
> +_scratch_xfs_admin -O bigtime=1 2>> $seqres.full
> +_check_scratch_xfs_features BIGTIME
> +_check_scratch_fs
> +_scratch_xfs_db -c 'version' -c 'sb 0' -c 'p' >> $seqres.full
> +
> +# Mount again, look at our files
> +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
> +ls -la $SCRATCH_MNT/* >> $seqres.full
> +
> +# Modify one of the timestamps to stretch beyond 2038
> +touch -d 'Feb 22 22:22:22 UTC 2222' $SCRATCH_MNT/b
> +
> +echo after upgrade:
There is an oddity in the output.
The text says "after upgrade" but the timestampt of b has changed because
it is really "after upgrade and stretch". Did you mean to print to output
"after upgrade" and then again "after upgrade and stretch"?
Thanks,
Amir.
