attr fork related fstests failures on for-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I'm seeing a couple different fstests failures on current for-next that
appear to be associated with e6a688c33238 ("xfs: initialise attr fork on
inode create"). The first is xfs_check complaining about sb versionnum
bits on various tests:

generic/003 16s ... _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/test-scratch is inconsistent (c)
(see /root/xfstests-dev/results//generic/003.full for details)
# cat results/generic/003.full
...
_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/test-scratch is inconsistent (c)
*** xfs_check output ***
sb versionnum missing attr bit 10
*** end xfs_check output
...
#

With xfs_check bypassed, repair eventually complains about some attr
forks. The first point I hit this variant is generic/117:

generic/117 9s ... _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/test-scratch is inconsistent (r)
(see /root/xfstests-dev/results//generic/117.full for details)
# cat results//generic/117.full
...
_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/test-scratch is inconsistent (r)
*** xfs_repair -n output ***
...
Phase 3 - for each AG...
        - scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists...
        - process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
        - agno = 0
bad attr fork offset 24 in dev inode 135, should be 1
would have cleared inode 135
bad attr fork offset 24 in dev inode 142, should be 1
would have cleared inode 142
...

Both problems disappear with e6a688c33238 reverted.

Brian




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux