On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 04:06:03AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32:39AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 07:19:25PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > > > Add basic test to make sure the functionality works as expected. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > tests/xfs/990 | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > tests/xfs/990.out | 12 ++++++++ > > > tests/xfs/group | 1 + > > > 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/990 > > > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/990.out > > > > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/990 b/tests/xfs/990 > > > new file mode 100755 > > > index 00000000..3c79186e > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/990 > > > @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ > > > +#! /bin/bash > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > +# Copyright (c) 2021 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > > > +# > > > +# FS QA Test 990 > > > +# > > > +# XFS shrinkfs basic functionality test > > > +# > > > +# This test attempts to shrink with a small size (512K), half AG size and > > > +# an out-of-bound size (agsize + 1) to observe if it works as expected. > > > +# > > > +seq=`basename $0` > > > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq > > > +echo "QA output created by $seq" > > > + > > > +here=`pwd` > > > +tmp=/tmp/$$ > > > +status=1 # failure is the default! > > > +trap "rm -f $tmp.*; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 > > > + > > > +# get standard environment, filters and checks > > > +. ./common/rc > > > +. ./common/filter > > > + > > > +test_shrink() > > > +{ > > > + $XFS_GROWFS_PROG -D"$1" $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > > > + ret=$? > > > > I'm not sure what's the output of xfs_growfs when shrinking filesystem, > > if it's easy to do filter, but it'd be good if we could just dump the > > output and let .out file match & check the test result. > > Not quite sure if it's of some use (e.g. also need to update expected output > when output changed), since I think just make sure the shrinked size is as > expected and xfs_repair won't argue anything on the new size, that would be > enough. > > > > > > + > > > + _scratch_unmount > > > + _repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full > > > > _repair_scratch_fs will fix corruption if there's any, and always return 0 if > > completes without problems. Is _check_scratch_fs() what you want? > > I didn't notice this, will update. > > > > > > + _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full > > > + > > > + $XFS_INFO_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.growfs >/dev/null > > > + . $tmp.growfs > > > + [ $ret -eq 0 -a $1 -eq $dblocks ] > > > > Just dump the expected size after shrink if possible. > > er... my idea is that I don't want to continue the test case > if any fails... if dump the expected size to output, I need to > fix blocksize as well, not sure if it's necessary. > > > > > > +} > > > + > > > +# real QA test starts here > > > +_supported_fs xfs > > > > Still missing _require_scratch > > No, _require_xfs_shrink will include that, just as _require_xfs_scratch_rmapbt. Then include the "scratch" part in the helper name, so it's clear that it requires the SCRATCH_DEV, i.e. _require_xfs_scratch_shrink > > > > > > +_require_xfs_shrink > > > + > > > +rm -f $seqres.full > > > +echo "Format and mount" > > > +_scratch_mkfs -dsize="$((512 * 1024 * 1024))" -dagcount=3 2>&1 | \ > > > + tee -a $seqres.full | _filter_mkfs 2>$tmp.mkfs > > > > Better to explain why mkfs with agcount=3 > > just because agcount = 1 is forbidden on purpose, and I need to make sure > shrinking to 2 AG is not possible yet. So agcount = 3 is the minimum number. > > It's just a functionality test, so agcount = 3 also makes the result > determinatively. Yeah, I'd guess the reason, but it'd be great to make it clear in comments. > > > > > > +. $tmp.mkfs > > > +t_dblocks=$dblocks > > > +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full > > > + > > > +echo "Shrink fs (small size)" > > > +test_shrink $((t_dblocks-512*1024/dbsize)) || \ > > > + _fail "Shrink fs (small size) failure" > > > > If it's possible to turn test_shrink to .out file matching way, _fail is > > not needed and below. > > The same as above. I could try to fix blocksize if the opinion is strong. > > > > > > + > > > +echo "Shrink fs (half AG)" > > > +test_shrink $((t_dblocks-agsize/2)) || \ > > > + _fail "Shrink fs (half AG) failure" > > > + > > > +echo "Shrink fs (out-of-bound)" > > > +test_shrink $((t_dblocks-agsize-1)) && \ > > > + _fail "Shrink fs (out-of-bound) failure" > > > +[ $dblocks -ne $((t_dblocks-agsize/2)) ] && \ > > > + _fail "dblocks changed after shrinking failure" > > > + > > > +$XFS_INFO_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full > > > +echo "*** done" > > > + > > > +# success, all done > > > +status=0 > > > +exit > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/990.out b/tests/xfs/990.out > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 00000000..812f89ef > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/990.out > > > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > > > +QA output created by 990 > > > +Format and mount > > > +meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks > > > +data = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT > > > + = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X > > > +naming =VERN bsize=XXX > > > +log =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX > > > +realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX > > > +Shrink fs (small size) > > > +Shrink fs (half AG) > > > +Shrink fs (out-of-bound) > > > +*** done > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group > > > index e861cec9..a7981b67 100644 > > > --- a/tests/xfs/group > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/group > > > @@ -525,3 +525,4 @@ > > > 525 auto quick mkfs > > > 526 auto quick mkfs > > > 527 auto quick quota > > > +990 auto quick growfs > > > > Maybe it's time to add a new 'shrinkfs' group? > > not sure if it needs, since shrinkfs reuses growfs ioctl. Ok, I have no strong preference on this, just think it's a bit easier to run only shrink tests by ./check -g shrinkfs. Thanks, Eryu