Re: [PATCH v1.1 3/3] common/populate: change how we describe cached populated images

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.1 3/3] common/populate: change how we describe cached populated images
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:22:51 +0000
Cc: guaneryu@xxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, guan@xxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20210324181748.GK1670408@magnolia>
References: <161647318241.3429609.1862044070327396092.stgit@magnolia> <161647319905.3429609.14862078528489327236.stgit@magnolia> <20210324181748.GK1670408@magnolia>

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:17:48AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The device name of a secondary storage device isn't all that important,
> but the size is.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCHSET 0/3] populate: fix a few bugs with fs pre-population
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH 3/3] common/populate: change how we describe cached populated images
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH v1.1 3/3] common/populate: change how we describe cached populated images
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 09/18] xfs: move the di_nblocks field to struct xfs_inode
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 06/18] xfs: don't clear the "dinode core" in xfs_inode_alloc
Previous by thread: [PATCH v1.1 3/3] common/populate: change how we describe cached populated images
Next by thread: [PATCHSET 0/3] fstests: test kernel regressions fixed in 5.12
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux