Re: [PATCH 06/11] xfs: deferred inode inactivation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 07:27:10AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Still digesting this.  What trips me off a bit is the huge amount of
> duplication vs the inode reclaim mechanism.  Did you look into sharing
> more code there and if yes what speaks against that?

TBH I didn't look /too/ hard because once upon a time[1] Dave was aiming
to replace the inode reclaim tagging and iteration with an lru list walk
so I decided not to entangle the two.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20191009032124.10541-23-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

--D



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux