On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 06:55:51PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:06:36PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Split the inode inactivation work into per-AG work items so that we can > > take advantage of parallelization. > > Any reason this isn't just done from the beginning? As-is is just > seems to create a fair amount of churn. I felt like the first patch was already too long at 1100 lines. I don't mind combining them, but with the usual proviso that I don't want the whole series to stall on reviewers going back and forth on this point without anyone offering an RVB. --D
