On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 08:35:59PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > So you won't review it until I have 100 outstanding patches in this > > series and it's completely and utterly unreviewable? > > Already unreviewable at 45, and I've only gotten through 2/3 of it. Yes. For patches that don't just repetitively apply similar changes to a few places, about 20 patches is the max that is digestable. > Here's something I haven't previously shared with all of you: Last cycle > when we were going around and around on the ENOSPC/EDQUOT retry loop > patches (which exploded from 13 to 41 patches) it was /very/ stressful > to have to rework this and that part every day and a half for almost > three weeks. As someone part of the loop I was a little surprised how quickly you did respin the patches. In general if I have feedback that requires a major rework of a non-trivial series, I do not want to touch it instantly. Let the discussion continue a bit, becaue it can easily turn into another direction and create more work. I think waiting a few days before doing anything that involves a lot of work generally helpsto make everyones life a little easier. > (TLDR: git branch plz) Yes, for any non-trivial series that really, really helps.
