Re: [PATCH 15/45] xfs: CIL work is serialised, not pipelined

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> It might be nice to leave that as a breadcrumb, then, in case the
> spinlock scalability problems ever get solved.

It might be already solved, depending on if Dave's rule of thumb
was determined before the Linux spinlocks switched to MCS locks or not.

In my experience spinlock scalability depends a lot on how long the
critical section is (that is very important, short sections are a lot
worse than long sections), as well as if the contention is inside a
socket or over sockets, and the actual hardware behaves differently too.

So I would be quite surprised if the "rule of 4" generally holds.

-Andi



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux