On 2/21/21 8:44 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 04:16:39PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:04:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: >> >>>> This upstream release ended up with an older version of config.guess in >>>> the tarball. Specifically, it was too old to recognize RISC-V as an >>>> architecture. >> >>> So was the RISC-V architecture added to the ubuntu build between the >>> uploads of the previous version of xfsprogs and xfsprogs-5.10.0? Or >>> is this an actual regression where the maintainer signed tarball had >>> RISC-V support in it and now it doesn't? >> >> This is a regression. The previous tarball (5.6.0) had a newer config.guess >> that recognized RISC-V, the newer one (5.10.0) had an older config.guess. > > Ok. > > Eric, did you change the machine you did the release build from? I don't recall doing so, but I must have. I guess I remember this coming up a while ago and maybe I failed to change process in a sticky way. :/ But - if my local toolchain can cause a regression in a major distro, it seems like this patch to regenerate is the obvious path forward, to control the distro-specific build, and not be subject to my personal toolchain whims. Is that not best practice? (I honestly don't know.) -Eric
