On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:02:28AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 08:47:29PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:58:39AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 09:47:01PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Create an error injection point so that we can simulate repair failing
> > > > after a certain phase.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > repair/globals.c | 3 +++
> > > > repair/globals.h | 3 +++
> > > > repair/progress.c | 3 +++
> > > > repair/xfs_repair.c | 4 ++++
> > > > 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ...
> > > > diff --git a/repair/progress.c b/repair/progress.c
> > > > index e5a9c1ef..5bbe58ec 100644
> > > > --- a/repair/progress.c
> > > > +++ b/repair/progress.c
> > > > @@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ timestamp(int end, int phase, char *buf)
> > > > current_phase = phase;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + if (fail_after_phase && phase == fail_after_phase)
> > > > + kill(getpid(), SIGKILL);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > It seems a little hacky to bury this in timestamp(). Perhaps we should
> > > at least check for end == PHASE_END (even though PHASE_START is
> > > currently only used in one place). Otherwise seems reasonable..
> >
> > Yeah, I don't know of a better place to put it -- adding another call
> > after every timestamp() just seems like clutter.
> >
>
> I was thinking that factoring timestamp() into a new post-phase helper
> seemed a relatively simple cleanup.
Ok, will do.
--D
> Brian
>
> > Will fix it to check for PHASE_END, though.
> >
> > Thanks for reading. :)
> >
> > --D
> >
> > > Brian
> > >
> > > > if (buf) {
> > > > tmp = localtime((const time_t *)&now);
> > > > sprintf(buf, _("%02d:%02d:%02d"), tmp->tm_hour, tmp->tm_min, tmp->tm_sec);
> > > > diff --git a/repair/xfs_repair.c b/repair/xfs_repair.c
> > > > index 12e319ae..6b60b8f4 100644
> > > > --- a/repair/xfs_repair.c
> > > > +++ b/repair/xfs_repair.c
> > > > @@ -362,6 +362,10 @@ process_args(int argc, char **argv)
> > > >
> > > > if (report_corrected && no_modify)
> > > > usage();
> > > > +
> > > > + p = getenv("XFS_REPAIR_FAIL_AFTER_PHASE");
> > > > + if (p)
> > > > + fail_after_phase = (int)strtol(p, NULL, 0);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > void __attribute__((noreturn))
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
