Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: reduce ilock acquisitions in xfs_file_fsync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 07:41:39AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > In fact, I wonder if we need to do anything other than just use
> > REQ_FUA unconditionally in iomap for this situation, as the block
> > layer will translate REQ_FUA to a write+post-flush if the device
> > doesn't support FUA writes directly.
> > 
> > You're thoughts on that, Christoph?
> 
> For the pure overwrite O_DIRECT + O_DSYNC case we'd get away with just
> a flush.  And using REQ_FUA will get us there, so it might be worth
> a try.

And looking at this a little more, while just using REQ_FUA would
work it would be rather suboptimal for many cases, as the block layer
flush state machine would do a flush for every bio.  So for each
O_DIRECT + O_DSYNC write that generates more than one bio we'd grow
extra flushes.



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux