Re: [PATCH 05/13] fs: don't call ->dirty_inode for lazytime timestamp updates
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: [PATCH 05/13] fs: don't call ->dirty_inode for lazytime timestamp updates
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date
: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:02:29 +0100
Cc
: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <
20210105005452.92521-6-ebiggers@kernel.org
>
References
: <
20210105005452.92521-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
> <
20210105005452.92521-6-ebiggers@kernel.org
>
User-agent
: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
References
:
[PATCH 00/13] lazytime fixes and cleanups
From:
Eric Biggers
[PATCH 05/13] fs: don't call ->dirty_inode for lazytime timestamp updates
From:
Eric Biggers
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH 01/13] fs: avoid double-writing inodes on lazytime expiration
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH 06/13] fs: pass only I_DIRTY_INODE flags to ->dirty_inode
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH 05/13] fs: don't call ->dirty_inode for lazytime timestamp updates
Next by thread:
[PATCH 09/13] fs: drop redundant checks from __writeback_single_inode()
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]
[Linux Filesystem Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Trails]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
