Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: define a new "needrepair" feature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: define a new "needrepair" feature
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 18:04:00 +0000
Cc: sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx, bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <160729617344.1606994.3329458995178500981.stgit@magnolia>
References: <160729616025.1606994.13590463307385382944.stgit@magnolia> <160729617344.1606994.3329458995178500981.stgit@magnolia>

Who is going to set this flag?  If the kernel ever sets it that is
a good way to totally brick systems if it happens on the root file
system.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: define a new "needrepair" feature
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/3] xfs: add the ability to flag a fs for repair
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH 2/3] xfs: define a new "needrepair" feature
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: move kernel-specific superblock validation out of libxfs
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: define a new "needrepair" feature
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: define a new "needrepair" feature
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: define a new "needrepair" feature
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux