[Bug 210535] [xfstests generic/466] XFS: Assertion failed: next_agino == irec->ir_startino + XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK, file: fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.c, line: 366

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210535

--- Comment #3 from darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx ---
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:14:26PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210535
> 
>             Bug ID: 210535
>            Summary: [xfstests generic/466] XFS: Assertion failed:
>                     next_agino == irec->ir_startino +
>                     XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK, file: fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.c, line:
>                     366
>            Product: File System
>            Version: 2.5
>     Kernel Version: xfs-linux xfs-5.10-fixes-7
>           Hardware: All
>                 OS: Linux
>               Tree: Mainline
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P1
>          Component: XFS
>           Assignee: filesystem_xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>           Reporter: zlang@xxxxxxxxxx
>         Regression: No
> 
> Created attachment 294021
>   --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=294021&action=edit
> generic-466.full
> 
> xfstests generic/466 hit below assertion failure on power9 ppc64le:
> 
> [16404.196161] XFS: Assertion failed: next_agino == irec->ir_startino +
> XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK, file: fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.c, line: 366

Does this patch fix it?

--D

From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fix the forward progress assertion in
xfs_iwalk_run_callbacks

In commit 27c14b5daa82 we started tracking the last inode seen during an
inode walk to avoid infinite loops if a corrupt inobt record happens to
have a lower ir_startino than the record preceeding it.  Unfortunately,
the assertion trips over the case where there are completely empty inobt
records (which can happen quite easily on 64k page filesystems) because
we advance the tracking cursor without actually putting the empty record
into the processing buffer.  Fix the assert to allow for this case.

Reported-by: zlang@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 27c14b5daa82 ("xfs: ensure inobt record walks always make forward
progress")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.c
index 2a45138831e3..eae3aff9bc97 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iwalk.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ xfs_iwalk_run_callbacks(
        /* Delete cursor but remember the last record we cached... */
        xfs_iwalk_del_inobt(tp, curpp, agi_bpp, 0);
        irec = &iwag->recs[iwag->nr_recs - 1];
-       ASSERT(next_agino == irec->ir_startino + XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK);
+       ASSERT(next_agino >= irec->ir_startino + XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK);

        error = xfs_iwalk_ag_recs(iwag);
        if (error)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux